What makes a powerful abstract?

• Connect to the conference theme. Show how your work relates to Radical Resistance – for example, by challenging stigma, oppressive policies, inequities, or demonstrating innovative, community-led approaches to harm reduction
• Have one clear message. Focus on the main takeaway rather than trying to cover everything you've done
• Explain the impact. Go beyond describing an activity. What changed? What was learned? Why should delegates care?
• Be specific. Include key evidence, findings, examples, or outcomes where possible. Concrete details are more persuasive than broad statements
• Centre lived experience and equity. Harm reduction values the voices of people with lived and living experience. Where relevant, explain how affected communities shaped the work
• Write for an international audience. Avoid unnecessary jargon and explain local context or acronyms that may not be familiar to delegates from other countries
• Follow the submission guidance. Stay within the word limit and answer every required section clearly

Reviewers are looking for abstracts that offer clear learning, evidence, or practical value, not just descriptions of activities.

Many abstracts outline a project or programme but don't answer key questions such as:

• What problem was addressed?
• What was done?
• What were the outcomes or key insights?
• What can others learn or apply?

Try not to assume that those reviewing your abstract know more about your project/work than they actually do - before submitting, ask someone who isn't directly involved in your work to read your abstract. If they can quickly explain what your project is, why it matters, and what delegates will learn, you're on the right track. If they can't, consider revising for clarity and focus!